Rapper Tay-K, whose real name is Taymor McIntyre, has been at the center of multiple legal battles over the years. His trial for the 2017 murder of photographer Mark Anthony Saldivar recently concluded, marking another chapter in his controversial history. Here’s a breakdown of the key moments, the verdict, and the sentence handed down by the judge.
Background: The Crimes That Led to Trial
Tay-K first gained notoriety in 2017 when he released his song The Race while on the run from authorities. He had been charged in connection with the 2016 murder of Ethan Walker during a home invasion in Texas. Instead of facing trial, he cut off his ankle monitor and fled, leading to his arrest months later.
While evading authorities, Tay-K was involved in another crime—the murder of Mark Anthony Saldivar in San Antonio. Prosecutors argued that Tay-K and his associates picked up Saldivar for a photoshoot, but the situation escalated into a robbery. Saldivar was fatally shot in a Chick-fil-A parking lot after attempting to retrieve his stolen photography equipment.
The Trial: Arguments and Key Moments
Tay-K’s trial for Saldivar’s murder took place in Bexar County, Texas. Initially, he was charged with capital murder, which carries an automatic life sentence without parole. However, after deliberations, the jury opted for a lesser charge of murder, sparing him from a life sentence.
During the trial, Tay-K’s defense team argued that the investigation was flawed. They believed it relied too heavily on witness statements. These statements were from individuals present in the car at the time of the shooting. His attorneys claimed that the prosecution failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Tay-K was responsible for the murder.
The prosecution, on the other hand, painted a different picture. They argued that Tay-K had a history of violent behavior and should be held accountable for his actions. They emphasized that Saldivar was robbed and killed in cold blood, urging the jury to deliver a harsh sentence.
The Verdict and Sentence
On April 15, 2025, the jury found Tay-K guilty of murder but not capital murder. This meant he avoided a mandatory life sentence but still faced significant prison time. The following day, Judge Stephanie Boyd sentenced him to 80 years in prison with credit for time served.
Judge Boyd addressed Tay-K directly, stating, “I do realize that while this is a lot of time, you’re still alive. You can still better yourself. But the complainant in this case is deceased, and you need to internalize that the complainant in this case is deceased. You’re going to have to make changes.”
This sentence will run concurrently with the 55-year sentence Tay-K received in 2019 for the 2016 murder of Ethan Walker. In total, he is set to serve 135 years in prison, effectively ensuring he will spend the rest of his life behind bars.
What are your thoughts on the case? Do you think the sentence was fair? Let’s discuss.
Leave a Reply