The financial health of our universities is important, especially when taxpayer money is involved. Right now, there is a major investigation underway into the finances of Texas Southern University (TSU), one of the state’s largest historically Black universities.
State leaders and auditors have found serious problems with how TSU has been handling its money. TSU’s Board of Regents has even admitted the university has faced “historical challenges” with its finances. Here is a simple breakdown of the current investigation and TSU’s past money issues.
The Big Money Problems (Current Audit Findings)
The Texas State Auditor’s Office looked closely at TSU’s money records. The preliminary report uncovered some very disturbing findings:
- Hundreds of Millions in Questionable Spending: Investigators flagged over $280 million worth of invoices that were linked to contracts that had already expired. This means the school was paying people and companies even though their contracts were no longer valid.
- Bills Before Approval: Thousands of invoices were billed before the purchases were officially requested or approved, which is against proper accounting rules.
- Poor Records: Auditors noted serious problems with:
- Tracking inventory (making it hard to know where university property is).
- Missing or invalid contracts.
- Financial reports being sent to the state late.
In short, the audit showed a breakdown in the basic, important rules for handling large amounts of money.
State Leaders React: A Criminal Investigation
The audit findings caused an immediate and strong reaction from Texas’s top officials:
- Governor Greg Abbott stepped in and asked the Texas Rangers (a part of the Department of Public Safety) to start a criminal investigation. Governor Abbott stated that “waste, fraud, and abuse will not be tolerated.”
- Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick called the findings “disturbing.” He suggested no more state money should go to TSU until these problems are fixed.
- Dan Patrick recently posted a letter on X (formerly known as Twitter)



💸 A History of Financial Trouble
The current problems are not the first time TSU has faced serious questions about its money. The university has dealt with several major scandals involving top leaders in the past:


President Priscilla Slade (Early 2000s): The former TSU president was accused of misusing hundreds of thousands of dollars of university money. This money was allegedly spent on personal luxury items like expensive home furnishings, landscaping for her house, and designer clothes. She was eventually fired and agreed to repay a portion of the funds. The university’s Chief Financial Officer (CFO) at the time was sentenced to prison.
President Austin Lane (2020): TSU’s president at the time was forced out after a scandal involving the law school. Allegations of bribery and kickbacks surfaced, where officials admitted unqualified students and improperly gave them over $430,000 in scholarships. Cashier’s checks and money orders were even found hidden in an admissions official’s office. spending are questionable, it raises concerns about financial health and whether all funds are going where they are supposed to. State auditors are expected to meet with TSU leaders soon to continue working toward a full resolution and better financial future for the university.
These past issues show that the struggle with financial oversight at TSU is a recurring problem that affects students and taxpayer funds.
What TSU Says & Why This Matters
TSU leaders know the current findings are serious and have promised to work with the state to fix the problems.
- The university says it is cooperating fully with the auditors and the criminal investigation.
- TSU has already started making changes, including putting a new purchasing system in place.
The investigations—past and present—are important because they protect the public funds used to run the university. Texas officials and citizens want to make sure that state tax dollars and tuition fees are spent correctly on education, not wasted due to poor procedures or bad decisions by leaders.
My only question is CAN YALL PLEASE HIRE SOMEONE WHO WON’T STEAL? Maybe the application and interview process should include a credit check and maybe a mental evaluation.🤔


















