The Whitsdom Press

Category: Social Media

  • Cardi B and Nicki Minaj got the X Streets Hot!

    The rivalry between two of hip-hop’s biggest female superstars, Cardi B and Nicki Minaj, has once again boiled over. It has turned into a vicious social media war on X (formerly Twitter). The rivalry started as a long-standing industry competition. It has now reached shocking new levels. This escalation involves deeply personal insults about family and children.

    The Early Days: From Respect to Rivalry

    In the beginning, Cardi B was an up-and-coming star. She openly expressed admiration for Nicki Minaj, the reigning queen of rap. However, as Cardi’s star rose at a meteoric rate with “Bodak Yellow,” the dynamic shifted. The first signs of tension appeared online, with fan bases clashing and subtle, often-deleted, shady comments made on Instagram Live. The core issue? There is a perceived battle for the top spot. This occurs in a male-dominated industry that often has room for only one woman at a time.

    The Infamous 2018 Harper’s Bazaar Event: The Heel Throw Seen ‘Round the World

    One of the most pivotal and documented moments in their feud happened off-social media but was endlessly dissected online. During New York Fashion Week in 2018, the two were involved in a physical altercation at a Harper’s Bazaar party.

    As detailed in numerous viral video breakdowns, the incident allegedly started over a disagreement concerning parenting and past comments. The confrontation escalated, culminating in Cardi B lunging at Nicki Minaj, and famously, a shoe was thrown. Cardi B later stormed out of the event with a visible knot on her head. The paparazzi footage of her, furious and explaining her side, became an instant meme and news story.

    The Spark: Album Sales and Subliminal Shots

    The feud officially flared up. It appeared that Nicki Minaj was mocking the commercial success of Cardi B’s new album. Nicki posted a deleted image referencing a “$4.99” promotional price and questioned the first-week sales numbers.

    This initial shade quickly moved into personal attacks, with both “rap queens” trading severe low blows.

    • Nicki’s Attacks (The Slugs): Nicki clowned Cardi’s lyrics, calling the Grammy winner “Barney Dangerous” and mocking her new song, “Magnet”. She also took a personal shot at Cardi’s pregnancy, calling her a “barefoot and smelly liar with a big belly”.
    • Cardi’s Counter-Attacks: Cardi B immediately fired back, roasting Nicki by bringing up family controversies, including Nicki’s convicted brother. She also accused Nicki of allegedly needing fertility treatments and questioned her ability to reproduce.

    Cardi also tried to shut down the comparison entirely. She told Nicki she should compare herself to peers who started their careers around the same time. Cardi stated that she was still in high school when Nicki first gained fame.

    The Unthinkable: Weaponizing Children and Family

    The conflict drew widespread condemnation. Both artists crossed a major taboo in celebrity beefs. They dragged their children into the fight. Commentators, including the hosts of The Breakfast Club, called the attacks on the children “irresponsible on both women’s part”.

    The confrontation became shocking when insults were traded regarding their kids:

    • The First Dig: The argument reportedly coincided with Nicki Minaj’s son, Papa Bear’s, birthday. Cardi B mocked Nicki for dedicating “essays” to the feud online instead of celebrating her child. Cardi wrote: “You haven’t even cut your kid’s cake yet… you must have took your first line of the day”.
    • The Low Blows: In a dangerous escalation, Nicki tweeted “Barney B and Culture Vulture.” She directly referenced Cardi B’s daughter, Culture. Cardi warned Nicki not to mention her children. The conversation then allegedly saw Nicki Minaj call Culture “ugly“.
    • The Shocking Response: Cardi B’s final response was shocking. She accused Nicki of allegedly abusing drugs. Cardi B claimed, “your son is nonverbal cuz you effed him up with drugs.” She suggested the insult came from jealousy.

    Final Thoughts

    Many mothers of non-verbal children felt Cardi was wrong. They believed that speaking on Nicki’s son, who allegedly has disabilities, was inappropriate, especially concerning children with autism. Nicki knew her child had disabilities before calling Cardi’s kids ‘monkeys’. She chose to log on Twitter on her kid’s birthday to pick a virtual fight with Cardi. She targeted Cardi’s children and got scolded for crossing the line. Cardi was wrong for engaging with Nicki and bringing up Nicki’s child as well.

    I posted an article a few days ago about Black Women weaponizing each other on social media and using their kids as weapons. This is no different. Stop using your kids as weapons.

  • The Digital Plantation: Black Women & YouTube’s Toxicity

    Let’s keep it 100, no chaser.

    YouTube gave us a microphone when the world often muted our voices. We built incredible spaces for natural hair journeys, financial literacy, cultural commentary, and unfiltered joy. We became the architects of our own narratives, building businesses and communities from our brilliance. But with that power has come a painful, self-inflicted darkness.

    While we rightfully call out injustice everywhere else, we often turn a blind eye to the venom. We hurl this venom at each other in our own digital backyards. It’s heartbreaking. It’s toxic. And it has to stop.

    From Sisterhood to Sabotage: The Ugly Flip Side of Our Success

    As Black women, I see our creativity, humor, and sheer dominance on this platform every day. But the flip side is a corrosive toxicity that twists celebration into jealousy and community into a battlefield.

    The triggers are almost always the same. It could be a disagreement over a man. Sometimes it’s jealousy about who’s the “number one” content creator in a niche. Other times, it’s simply the inability to handle another sister’s shine. Instead of using our platforms to uplift, we drag each other down for views, clicks, and super chats. We’ve gone from healthy competition to a crab-in-a-barrel mentality, digitized and on steroids.

    The New Age of Bullying: When “Drama” Becomes Dangerous

    This isn’t the messy comment sections of years past. Cyberbullying in our community has evolved into a coordinated, malicious campaign with real-world consequences.

    We’ve weaponized the internet’s darkest tools, and we’re aiming them squarely at each other:

    • The Art of Doxxing: You disagree with somebody? Suddenly, her home address and private phone number are “exposed.” This isn’t winning an argument; it’s putting her physical safety at risk.
    • Weaponizing the System: The go-to move is no longer to create better content. It’s to make false reports to the FBI, police, or CPS. You’re not just trying to get her demonetized. You’re using systems steeped in bias against a fellow Black woman. This can potentially threaten her life. It can also endanger her children and her freedom.
    • Digital Blackface with AI: The latest low? Using artificial intelligence to create images to taunt or make fun of someone or deepfake compromising images. This is the modern-day digital lynching, stripping a sister of her dignity because you can’t stand her success…or HER period.
    • Wishing Ill on Innocents: The comments have moved beyond “I hope you fail.” They have escalated to “I hope your kids get ____.” We are speaking curses onto each other’s children. When did we become f**ked up women?

    This isn’t “YouTube streets.” This is destructive, dangerous behavior that causes real mental health struggles and can spill over into real-life violence.

    Why Are We Doing the Oppressor’s Work For Him?

    We know the world doesn’t love us. We fight systemic racism, bigotry, and misogyny every single day. So why are we so eager to do their work for them?

    There’s a deeper issue here. Many of us grew up in environments where women were pitted against each other. The idea that another Black woman’s success means there’s less for you—is a lie we’ve internalized and digitized. Instead of breaking the cycle, we teach other Black women that hate and sabotage are the price of success. These women are aspiring or rising content creators.

    A Call for Accountability: Reclaiming Our Digital Space

    This isn’t about being perfect or never disagreeing. It’s about realizing that we don’t have to destroy each other to create content. We can disagree, debate, and critique without threatening lives and livelihoods.

    It’s time to hold up a mirror and ask ourselves, as creators and consumers:

    • Am I building my platform on positivity and authenticity and REAL CONTENT—or on bullying and tearing down other women?
    • Am I teaching the younger ones to stand tall or to stoop low for views?
    • Am I adding value to the culture, or am I contributing to its destruction?

    Every time we attack each other, we hand power back to the very systems that silence us. While we’re busy calling the FBI and CPS on each other, brands and real opportunities pass us by. The algorithm may thrive on negativity, but it comes at the cost of our collective soul.

    Our Path to Healing: Choosing Community Over Clicks

    We are powerful, resilient, and brilliant. Our ancestors dreamed of a day we could have our own platforms and our own economy. We are living that dream, but we’re using it to play a toxic, high-stakes game.

    Let’s commit to doing better, starting today:

    • Check Your Motives: Before you post, ask: “Am I building up, or am I tearing down?”
    • Withhold Your Click: Stop feeding the beast. Don’t engage with these channels dedicated to destruction. Starve them of the currency they crave.
    • Practice Radical Support: Actively support the Black women creators you love. Share their content. Defend them respectfully. Create a counter-culture of love.

    There are so many things happening that are affecting us and we’re so busy online attacking each other. It is disgusting. We as black women need to be nicer to each other on these social media platforms. It is okay if we don’t like or don’t agree with someone. However, channeling that anger into getting people fired, doxxed, or getting their children taken is evil. This behavior needs to be studied because what the hell is the point! Log off and be mothers. Log off and go outside and live your life that you claim you have. If and or when they get rid of these social media platforms, then what do you have? NOTHING.

  • Don’t Panic: The Real Story on Section 8, Work Rules, and “New Evictions”

    You’ve probably seen the viral posts or videos titled “New rules are forcing Section 8 recipients to work!” or “People are getting kicked out of housing right now!” It’s scary, and it’s spreading fast. Let’s clear the air. Most of what you’re hearing is based on myths and misunderstandings. This article breaks down the facts in simple language, so you know exactly what’s true and what’s not.

    Myth #1: Brand New Work Requirements Are Kicking People Out

    The Truth: This is the most common and frightening myth. Let’s separate the facts from the fiction.

    Are there work requirements for Section 8 right now?

    Yes, but they are not new and they are not as strict as the rumors claim. The current rules have been in place for a long time. Here’s how they work for most families:

    • If you are an adult (18-61 years old) and not retired or disabled, you are generally expected to work. You should be in a job training program or be enrolled in school.
    • This does NOT mean you have to work 40 hours a week. The rule is often called the “30-hour rule.” This means you’re expected to work 30 hours a week. You can also participate in a qualifying program.
    • There are many exceptions. You are usually exempt from these rules if you are elderly (62+). The same applies if you are a person with a disability, pregnant, or caring for a young child.

    So, what’s all the talk about “new” work rules?

    Politicians have proposed making these rules stricter. However, these are just proposals. They are NOT law. No new national work rules for Section 8 have been passed or put into effect. The program is running under the same rules as it has been.

    Myth #2: People Are Being Evicted Right Now Because of New Changes

    The Truth: This is 100% false. Since no new national rules have started, no one is being kicked out of their home because of them.

    So, why do people sometimes lose their Section 8 voucher? It’s for reasons that have always been in place. The number one reason is simple: not paying their portion of the rent. Here’s a breakdown of the real reasons a voucher can be taken away:

    • Failure to Pay Rent: Your Section 8 voucher is a partnership. The program pays a large chunk of your rent, but you are responsible for paying your share to the landlord. If you don’t pay what you owe, your landlord can evict you. The housing authority can also take away your voucher.
    • Breaking the Lease or the Law: This includes serious issues. Damaging the property is one example. Committing crimes in the home is another. Finally, having unauthorized people live with you is also a serious issue.
    • Skipping Your Annual Recertification: Every year, you must meet with your housing agency to confirm your income and family situation. If you don’t show up or provide the needed paperwork, you risk losing your benefits.

    You may see a story online about someone losing their Section 8. Almost always, it is for one of these reasons. It is not due to a mysterious new government rule.

    What’s the Bottom Line for You?

    • If you currently have a Section 8 voucher: You can relax. Your housing assistance is safe from these proposed new rules. The work requirements you have to follow are the ones you already know about. The best thing you can do is what you’re already supposed to do. Meet your current program obligations. Pay your rent on time. Be a good tenant. Stay in contact with your housing agency.
    • If you’re hearing scary stories: Always check the source. A viral video or social media post is not a reliable source of legal information. The only place to get the real facts about your voucher is from your local Public Housing Agency (PHA). They are there to help you understand your specific situation.

    In summary: Don’t let the rumors scare you. Current work rules are not new, and stricter proposals are not in effect. Your voucher is protected as long as you follow the existing program rules. Pay your rent ON TIME. Focus on what you can control. Get your information directly from your housing agency. This helps avoid the stress of online misinformation. At the same time, make sure your affairs are in order. If you DO need a job, check out my jobs page full of work from home positions.

  • You’re Not Welcome: How TSU Students Shut Down a MAGA Stunt Targeting Their HBCU

    Let’s not sugarcoat this. In the wake of the Charlie Kirk assassination, when MAGA rhetoric is already threatening HBCUs, a group of conservative provocateurs thought it was the perfect time for a field trip. Their destination? Tennessee State University (TSU), a proud Historically Black College and University (HBCU). Their mission? Not dialogue, but a calculated stunt designed to provoke Black students for social media content.

    The message from TSU students was swift, unified, and crystal clear: Get out.

    The Recipe for Provocation: A Bad-Faith Stunt

    A group calling themselves the “Fearless Debaters” rolled onto TSU’s campus unannounced and uninvited. Like copycats of Charlie Kirk, they’re on a tour they claim is about “open dialogue.” But their actions at TSU revealed their true goal.

    They didn’t seek permission from the university, violating clear campus policy. They simply set up a table while wearing MAGA hats and holding signs designed to incite anger: “DEI Should Be Illegal” and “Deport All Illegals.”

    Students Draw the Line: Protecting Their Sanctuary

    The students didn’t play their game. Within minutes, TSU students surrounded the group, not to debate, but to deliver a powerful message: your presence is an act of aggression, and you are not welcome here.

    The situation escalated because the provocateurs wanted it to. Campus police had to intervene, escorting the group off campus for their own safety. The university later released a statement confirming the obvious: these individuals had no authorization to be there, and the students conducted themselves professionally in the face of a deliberate disruption.

    But of course, the agitators ran to social media to play the victim. They called the students a “hostile mob” and even had the audacity to ask their followers to defund TSU—punishing a university because its students refused to be antagonized.

    Screenshots from my comments section to my response video regarding this story. 250+ comments and 98% are saying we are untrained animals and how Trump should defund HBCUs. Feel free to click on each pic. Matter of fact, if you have the Threads app, go directly to THIS LINK.

    Let’s be real. Choosing an HBCU—a sanctuary built because Black people were banned from white institutions—to debate whether diversity should exist or whether people should be deported isn’t a search for truth. It’s a well-timed performance for clicks. They knew exactly the reaction they would get, and they were banking on it to go viral so they could dog us in the comments.

    The Real Issue: Safety Over Their Victim Narrative

    The real story isn’t about a “mob.” It’s about safety. How did unaffiliated individuals with openly hostile messaging so easily access campus? This exposes a critical flaw in HBCU campus security that parents and alumni should be furious about.

    In a climate where figures like Charlie Kirk are targeted, allowing unvetted provocateurs to waltz onto a Black campus is a massive security failure. The students weren’t being hostile; they were responding to a perceived threat. They were protecting their community from outsiders who came to disrupt their peace for political points.

    A Final Warning to Other Provocateurs

    The incident at TSU is a warning shot. HBCUs are not playgrounds for racist experiments disguised as debate. The students at TSU stood up and demonstrated that they will not be used as props in a bad-faith political theater.

    This was intentional. There is an “agenda for this foolishness,” and it won’t be the last attempt. HBCUs across the nation must review their security protocols immediately. Parents should be calling administrations to demand answers. We must protect these sacred spaces. Be aware of the rhetoric and slogans being used while they run this play.

    To the Fearless Debaters and anyone else thinking of pulling a similar stunt: You are not brave. You are not victims. This isn’t about not wanting to have “the debate.” It is about bad timing, campus safety, what has happened in the last 2 weeks, and the hates you wear and represent. When C.K. was assassinated, HBCUs received threats a day after. Of course they will not welcome you! HBCUs, please tighten up your security.

    And before you call THOSE college students at Tennessee State “animals” don’t forget how your kind acted last year at Ole Miss when there was a Pro-Palestinian protest on campus.

  • RaptureTok: Fear, Humor, and Prophecy

    In September 2025, TikTok filled up with videos about the Rapture. This trend, called RaptureTok, started after South African pastor Joshua Mhlakela said he had a dream that Jesus would return on September 23–24, 2025. The dream was first shared on YouTube and then quickly spread to TikTok, where the hashtag #RaptureTok gained hundreds of thousands of posts.

    People on TikTok reacted in very different ways. Some truly believe the prophecy. They posted videos about quitting their jobs, selling their homes, and leaving Bibles behind for those who might be “left on Earth.” One woman even said losing her job was a sign that the September date was real.

    Others took a lighter approach and used humor. Creators made funny videos about how the Rapture might look, joked about pets floating up into the sky, and even shared “Rapture travel tips” as if heaven was a vacation trip.

    But not all reactions were fun. Some people said RaptureTok brought back bad memories from growing up in strict churches. They talked about “rapture trauma,” which means being scared about the end of the world as kids. Others admitted they felt afraid after watching so many videos, with one woman saying she wanted to spend her last days with her children.

    The Bible verses often linked to the Rapture include 1 Thessalonians 4:16–17, which says believers will be “caught up in the clouds.” Pastor Mhlakela’s vision fits with the belief that Christians will be taken before hard times hit Earth. Still, critics point to Matthew 24:36, where Jesus says no one knows the exact day or hour of His return—not even the angels.

    History shows many past predictions about the Rapture have been wrong. Remember Y2K? Remember the Haley Comet Cult? Every attempt to set a date has failed. Each time, people felt fear, disappointment, or even laughed at the idea afterward. RaptureTok is simply the newest version of this, but with the power of TikTok, it spread faster than ever.

    The Rapture is a real belief in Christianity, but many pastors warn against setting dates. Instead, they say people should live ready every day, focusing on faith, love, and hope.

    RaptureTok shows how quickly social media can spread both fear and comedy—but it also reminds us that the truth of the Rapture is not about setting dates, but about how we live now.

  • Disney in Trouble: Boycott, Cancellations, and a Huge Lawsuit

    Disney is in big trouble right now. The company is losing billions of dollars, people are cancelling their subscriptions, and late-night host Jimmy Kimmel is suing them for $1 billion.

    Billions Lost in Just Days

    Reports say Disney has lost about $3.8 billion after this new controversy. Their stock dropped, and many people are cancelling Disney+, Hulu, ESPN, and even park passes and cruises. This shows that when people come together, they can hurt big companies where it matters most—their money.

    Why People Are Boycotting Disney

    The boycott started after ABC (owned by Disney) suspended Jimmy Kimmel. He made comments about Charlie Cox’s death, and critics say Disney punished him because of political pressure.

    Fans and viewers were angry. On social media, hashtags spread fast. Thousands of people shared proof that they had cancelled Disney services.

    To slow down the cancellations, Disney and Hulu started offering special deals—like six months for only $2.99—showing how desperate they are to keep customers.

    Jimmy Kimmel Fights Back

    Jimmy Kimmel didn’t just walk away. He filed a $1 billion lawsuit against Disney and ABC. He says the company broke his contract, hurt his creative control, and damaged his reputation. If this lawsuit moves forward, it could be one of the biggest battles between a star and a company in Hollywood history.

    Trouble for Disney’s CEO

    A lot of people are blaming Disney’s CEO, Bob Iger. He came back to the company during the pandemic, but since then many say he has made bad choices—like firing actors, laying off workers, and now pushing for Kimmel’s suspension.

    Even former Disney leaders are saying Disney made a mistake and should bring Kimmel back.

    The Power of the People

    This story isn’t just about Jimmy Kimmel. It’s about how regular people can push back against giant companies.

    By cancelling subscriptions, customers are reminding Disney that they are the ones keeping the business alive. Money talks, and right now people are speaking loudly.

    What Happens Next?

    Disney is trying to figure out what to do. They are losing money fast, customers are leaving, and Kimmel’s team may not even want to work with them again.

    The big question is: Will Disney fix this and bring Kimmel back, or has the damage already gone too far?

    One thing is clear: the people have spoken, and Disney is feeling the pressure.

  • Idaho Police Shooting of Autistic Teen Sparks Anger

    On April 7, 2025, a 17-year-old autistic teenager named Victor Perez was shot nine times by police in Pocatello, Idaho. This left him in critical condition with a leg amputated. His chances of survival are uncertain. The incident occurred during Autism Awareness Month. This has caused widespread anger. It has also raised urgent questions about how police handle situations involving people with disabilities.

    What Happened?

    Police responded to a 911 call about a “domestic disturbance.” A neighbor reported a teen with a knife chasing people in a backyard. The caller thought the teen was drunk, but his family later explained Victor has autism, cerebral palsy, and cannot speak. His disabilities cause him to walk unsteadily, which might have been mistaken for intoxication 4910.

    When officers arrived, they ran to a chain-link fence separating them from Victor, who was sitting on the ground. Security footage shows Victor standing up and stumbling toward the officers with a kitchen knife. Within 12–20 seconds of exiting their cars, four officers fired multiple shots through the fence, hitting him nine times 3916. His sister screamed that he was “special,” but it’s unclear if police heard her.

    Why Are People Upset?

    1. Speed of the Shooting: Critics say police didn’t try to de-escalate. They did not use non-lethal tools like Tasers or pepper spray. Department policy requires officers to carry them.
    2. Victor’s Disabilities: His family says he couldn’t understand commands due to his autism and intellectual disability. They’d never called police for help before, highlighting a lack of prior interaction with law enforcement.
    3. Autism Awareness Month Timing: The shooting occurred during a month meant to promote understanding of autism. This timing made the tragedy feel even more painful to advocates.

    Social Media Reacts

    Online, people are sharing the witness video and demanding change. Many comments focus on police training gaps:

    • “Why shoot so fast? They need better training for disabilities!”.
    • “This is why cops should learn how autism affects behavior,” wrote one user.
    • Protesters outside the police station said, “We can’t trust them after this”.

    Police Response

    Pocatello’s police chief defended the officers, saying they faced an “immediate threat” because two people were near Victor. He also noted the viral video shows “only one angle” and urged patience during the investigation. However, experts like former officer Seth Stoughton questioned why police didn’t create space between themselves and Victor instead of shooting. Sir, THERE WAS A WHOLE GATE AND YARD SEPARATING THEM!!!

    What’s Next?

    Victor remains hospitalized with severe injuries, including possible brain damage. An independent task force is investigating, and over 500 people have signed a petition demanding accountability. Meanwhile, advocates stress the need for better police training to recognize disabilities and use calm strategies.

    Final Thoughts
    This heartbreaking incident underscores a harsh reality: police often aren’t prepared to interact with autistic or disabled individuals. During Autism Awareness Month, many are asking—how can we prevent this from happening again? Training, community outreach, and policies that prioritize de-escalation could be a start. For now, Victor’s family and supporters wait for answers—and hope he survives.

  • Black TikTokers Urge Sit Out for April 5th Protests

    On April 5, 2025, large protests called the “Hands Off! National Day of Action” took place across the U.S. People rallied against policies linked to former President Donald Trump and Elon Musk. They focused on issues like cuts to Social Security, threats to democracy, and unfair tax benefits for the wealthy. Organized by groups like the Human Rights Campaign, the goal was to pressure lawmakers to stop these policies.

    Why TikTok Warned Black People to “Sit Yo Black Ass Down”

    A viral TikTok trend urged Black Americans to avoid the protests, sparking widespread discussion. Many Black creators raised concerns about safety. They pointed to Trump’s history of threatening to use the military or National Guard to control protests. They worried this would lead to violence or even martial law. Others highlighted the long history of Black protesters facing harsher treatment. Police or counter-protesters treat them more severely compared to other groups.

    Critics also argued that the protests centered issues that mattered more to ‘white liberals.’ These issues included tax cuts for the wealthy. The protests did not focus (or include) on urgent priorities for Black communities, like police violence or systemic racism. Some felt Black voices were being used to support causes that didn’t tackle their specific struggles. To spread their message, Black TikTokers used humor and creativity.

    Be sure to subscribe to @PeaceOfMind-LAPC on Youtube!

    Behind the jokes, though, was a serious call to focus on safer actions with greater impact. Many suggested supporting Black-owned businesses. They also recommended practicing self-care to cope with political (or everyday) stress. Others advocated organizing locally around issues that directly affect their communities. Common folk like me will just stay home, be with the family, and hop on the video game.

    Did People Listen?

    While the April 5th protests drew crowds in cities like New York and Washington, D.C., many Black activists chose to stay home. The TikTok movement revealed a divide in how people view activism. Some still believe mass protests are powerful tools for change. Others argue that marginalized groups, like Black Americans, need to prioritize safety. They should adopt strategies that directly benefit their communities. May I remind you that WE Black people went to the polls? We constantly educated ourselves about this administration. Yet, we still got fade? Yep, we are sitting this one out.

    The TikTok-driven April 5th Protest reflects a growing sentiment among Black communities. It shows that participation in activism doesn’t have to look the same for everyone. Whether through protests, mutual aid, or rest, the goal remains fighting systemic inequities while safeguarding mental and physical well-being.

    Watch this live feed. Not a speck of us out there. Someone even shouted “Black Lives Matter” but that someone didn’t look like me.

  • Dawn Robinson: From Music Stardom to Homelessness

    Dawn Robinson became famous in the 1990s as a member of the hit R&B group En Vogue. Known for songs like “Hold On” and “My Lovin’ (You’re Never Gonna Get It),” her powerful voice made her a star. But years later, she faced tough times, even living in her car.

    Her Music Career

    En Vogue (1990) Born to Sing album

    Dawn started with En Vogue in 1989. The group’s albums, like Born to Sing (1990) and Funky Divas (1992), sold millions of copies. She sang lead on big hits like “Free Your Mind” and “Don’t Let Go (Love).” But in 1997, she left the group after fighting over money and contracts.

    Lucy Pearl, 2000

    After En Vogue, she joined a new group called Lucy Pearl with other famous musicians. Their first album did well, but Dawn left when she felt she wasn’t paid fairly. She later released her own solo album in 2002 and sang on songs for movies like The Rugrats Movie. She also acted in TV shows, including R&B Divas: Los Angeles.

    Money Problems and Living in Her Car

    @tmz

    DawnRobinson, the leading voice for R&B powerhouses EnVogue, LucyPearl, and even Dr. Dre’s Firm supergroup at one point, is cleaning out her closet … revealing she’s been homeless, sleeping in her car for nearly 3 years. Full story in bio!

    ♬ original sound – TMZ – TMZ

    By 2022, Dawn’s career had slowed down. She said managers treated her unfairly, and family issues made things harder. At one point, a manager paid for her to stay in a hotel for eight months but wouldn’t help her find a permanent home. Feeling trapped, she decided to live in her car instead. In 2025, she explained, “I felt free living in my car. I’m learning about who I am.”

    Dawn Robinson and, now ex-husband Andre Allen in 2004

    In March 2025, her ex-husband, André Allen—who works at a Hilton hotel—offered her a job to help her get back on her feet. Though they divorced in 2010, they stayed friends. He said he cared about her and wanted her to have stability. But Dawn turned down the offer, saying she wanted to stay independent and keep focusing on music.

    Speaking Out Against Unfair Treatment

    Dawn has always been open about how the music industry treated her poorly. She claims En Vogue made very little money from selling 28 million records, saying each member earned just “two cents per girl.” She also said she lost her house after leaving Lucy Pearl because of payment disputes.

    Her Legacy and Strength

    Even with her struggles, Dawn’s music legacy is huge. En Vogue earned eight Grammy nominations during her time with the group, and she won awards like the Soul Train Music Award. Today, she still makes music and encourages fans to support groups that help artists in need.

    What We Can Learn

    Dawn’s story shows how fame doesn’t always mean financial safety, especially for older artists who didn’t earn much from streaming or fair contracts. Her choice to live in her car—and say no to her ex-husband’s help—proves she values her freedom over comfort. Her life reminds us to treat struggling artists with kindness and push for better support in the music industry.

  • Marvin Sapp and the $40,000 Stickup

    Marvin Sapp is a popular gospel singer and pastor. He is well-known for his inspirational songs like “Never Would Have Made It” and “The Best in Me.” But recently, he made headlines for something that has sparked a lot of conversation. During a church service, Sapp asked his congregation to help raise $40,000 for his church. This request has led some people to question why such a large amount of money was needed. Others are asking how it was requested.

    The Situation: What Happened?

    The story began at Pastor Marvin Sapp’s church in Fort Worth, Texas. He asked the congregation for a donation of $40,000. He explained that the money would be used to help the church continue its work and support community projects. But the request raised eyebrows. This was because $40,000 seemed like a lot of money to ask for from the church members. Above all, he made the ushers LOCK THE DOORS to where no one would leave instead before tithing.

    Viral footage of Marvin Sapp demanding his congregation $40,000

    The question wasn’t necessarily about what the money was for. It was about how much was being asked for. People also questioned whether it was the right amount to request all at once. Many people wondered if it was fair to ask for such a large donation in a single service.

    Marvin Sapp’s Response

    After people started questioning his request, Marvin Sapp defended it on Facebook. He said that the money wasn’t just for the church’s needs. It was also to help the community and support various programs. He assured people that no one was forced to donate. It was up to each person to give what they could. Despite this, some people felt that asking for such a large amount might have been too much. This was especially true for a congregation that included people with different financial situations.

    The Bigger Issue: Money and Faith

    The request for $40,000 has sparked concerns. There is a growing trend of pastors asking for large amounts of money from their congregations. The debate over Marvin Sapp’s $40,000 donation request brings up a larger issue: the relationship between money and church ministry.

    TikTok compilation of reactions about Marvin Sapp

    Marvin Sapp’s $40,000 donation request might have sparked some controversy. However, it’s also part of a larger discussion about money and faith in churches among the Black community.

    In my opinion, $40,000 sounds like some gambling debt or he picked up bad habit. If I was in that church and he said “lock the door”…