Category: politics

  • Job Corps Paused by Department of Labor

    Imagine this: You finally have a safe place to live. You are training for your dream job or a job better than fast-food. Then, out of nowhere, someone tells you: “Pack up. You have to leave. Now.”

    That’s the real nightmare for 25,000 students right now. The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has paused almost all Job Corps centers across the country. The reason? Major budget cuts.

    What is Job Corps?

    Job Corps is a FREE government program for teens and young adults (16-24) who are struggling. It helps people who didn’t finish high school due to personal circumstances. These individuals faced challenges during that time. Some have nowhere safe to live. Others can’t find a good job.

    The program offers free housing amenities (living in campus dorms) and free meals. It provides assistance towards earning a GED. There is hands-on job training for the workforce. Support from academic and mental health counselors is also available.

    For many students, Job Corps was their only lifeline to a better future.

    What Happened?

    Recently, all centers must close and send their students back to their homes on record by June 30, 2025. Only 24 centers ran by the USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture) will stay open. Students got almost no warning – some had just hours to pack. Many couldn’t grab their stuff: meds, IDs, clothes, or school certificates got locked inside.

    Why Did This Happen?

    According to the Department of Labor’s press release (dated 5/29):

    The Job Corps program has faced significant financial challenges under its current operating structure. In PY 2024, the program operated at a $140 million deficit, requiring the Biden administration to implement a pause in center operations to complete the program year.

    Next Steps

    The 5/29 press release included FAQs about Job Corps’ recent pause; covering topics such as transportation, transfer credits, and other next steps:

    These young people were working hard for a better future. Without the stress of bills or housing, they could focus on developing their workforce skills. However, budget cuts are pushing them back into the jungles they were trying to escape.

  • Slashing AmeriCorps: Staff Reductions and Shutdowns Put National Volunteer Work at Risk

    Recent reports show that AmeriCorps, a U.S. government program supporting volunteer work has faced significant changes. In April 2025, about 75% of its full-time staff were placed on administrative leave following actions by the Trump administration’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This decision also led to the shutdown of the National Civilian Community Corps (NCCC), which includes the FEMA Corps program that helps communities recover from disasters . These cuts have raised concerns about the program’s ability to continue its mission of addressing critical needs like education, poverty, and disaster relief through volunteer efforts.

    Key points about the recent cuts include staff reduction, program closures, and impact. In April 2025, 75% of AmeriCorps employees were put on paid leave, disrupting operations. The NCCC and FEMA Corps, critical for disaster recovery, were shut down. These changes could weaken AmeriCorps’ ability to support communities during emergencies and deliver long-term projects.

    What Is AmeriCorps?
    AmeriCorps is a federal program created in 1993 under President Bill Clinton to unite Americans in volunteer service. Its goal is to improve lives, strengthen communities, and promote civic engagement. Over 5 million Americans have participated in its programs, which focus on education, environmental conservation, public health, and disaster response. 

    The idea of national service dates back to programs like the Civilian Conservation Corps (1930s) and Volunteers in Service to America (VISTA, 1965), which aimed to combat poverty. In 1993, the National and Community Service Trust Act merged VISTA and other programs into AmeriCorps. This created a unified agency to manage volunteer initiatives like AmeriCorps NCCC (disaster relief) and AmeriCorps State and National (local community projects). Over the years, AmeriCorps expanded to include efforts like addressing the opioid crisis, supporting STEM education, and responding to COVID-19. By 2016, it had engaged 1 million members. 

  • Letitia James and the Mortgage Fraud Allegations: What You Need to Know

    New York Attorney General Letitia James, a prominent figure in U.S. politics, is now facing serious accusations from the Trump administration. Here’s a simple breakdown of who she is. The breakdown includes the allegations against her. It also explains why former President Donald Trump is pushing for her prosecution.

    Who Is Letitia James?

    Letitia James, often called “Tish” James, is the New York Attorney General. She made history as the first Black woman elected to this role in 2019. Known for taking on high-profile cases, she’s sued pharmaceutical companies over the opioid crisis. She also led investigations into former Governor Andrew Cuomo’s sexual harassment claims. But she’s most famous for her legal battles against Donald Trump. In 2022, she sued Trump for financial fraud, accusing him of lying about his property values to get better loans. A judge later ordered Trump to pay over $500 million in fines (including interest) .

    The Mortgage Fraud Allegations
    In April 2025, the Trump administration accused James of mortgage fraud. The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) took legal action by sending a criminal referral to the Department of Justice. They claimed James falsified documents to get better loan deals. Here’s what she’s accused of:

    1. False Residency Claims: In 2023, James bought a home in Norfolk, Virginia. She listed it as her “primary residence” on mortgage paperwork. However, New York law requires her to live in the state as attorney general. Critics say she lied to secure a lower interest rate.
    2. Misleading Property Details: James owns a Brooklyn building purchased in 2001. The FHFA claims she labeled it as having four units instead of five. This was to qualify for a government-backed loan meant for smaller properties.
    3. Family Document Issues: In 1983 and 2000, James and her father signed mortgage papers. These papers incorrectly stated they were “husband and wife” instead of father and daughter. While this is decades old, critics argue it shows a pattern of dishonesty.

    If proven, these acts could lead to charges like bank fraud, wire fraud, or making false statements to financial institutions.

    Why Is Trump Involved?

    Donald Trump has repeatedly called James “corrupt” and accused her of targeting him for political reasons.

    After she won her fraud case against him, Trump vowed to “go after his enemies” if re-elected. Now, his administration is pushing for her prosecution, calling it a response to her “weaponizing” the legal system against him.

    Legal experts note the irony: James prosecuted Trump for falsifying financial records, and now she’s accused of similar acts. Fox News legal analyst Jonathan Turley said, “If we apply the Letitia James standard, there would be little question here”.

    James’ Response

    James denies all wrongdoing. Her office stated that the accusations were a political attack. “She will not be intimidated by bullies — no matter who they are” was their response. Supporters argue the Trump administration is retaliating for her lawsuits against him, including efforts to block federal funding cuts.

    What Happens Next?

    No formal charges have been filed yet. The Department of Justice will decide whether to investigate. Legal experts say some allegations (like the 1983 documents) may be too old to prosecute due to statutes of limitations. However, the 2023 Virginia property claims could still pose a risk.

    Politically, the case could hurt James’ reputation. Critics argue she’s being accused of the same fraud she prosecuted Trump for, which may weaken public trust.

    The Bigger Picture

    This clash highlights the deep divide in U.S. politics. Supporters of Trump see James as part of a system trying to sabotage him. Her supporters believe she’s holding powerful people accountable. Whether the allegations hold up in court or not, the drama between James and Trump is far from over.

  • Understanding Texas Laws of 2025: Education, Energy, and Security

    The laws passed by Texas lawmakers in 2025 will shape the cost of raising a family. They will determine the safety of neighborhoods. They will also affect the future of the state’s energy grid. These decisions range from debates about teacher pay to new school funding. They also include border security programs and power grid rules. They touch the daily lives of Texans, affecting paychecks, property taxes, and electricity bills. They even influence what students learn in classrooms. Billions of dollars are on the line. There are heated disagreements over issues like abortion rights and renewable energy. Understanding these changes isn’t just about politics. It’s about how Texans live, work, and plan for the years ahead. Here’s what you need to know.

    Photo: Texas Tribune
    1. Education & School Funding
      • House Bill 2: A bipartisan $8 billion public school funding package passed the Texas House. It includes teacher pay raises and limits on untrained teachers. Senator Will Metcalf expressed his views after the House approved House Bill 2. He remarked, “This $8 billion investment in public education is a step forward. However, we must continue to address the challenges our schools face, from teacher shortages to special education funding.”
      • School Vouchers: Efforts to expand voucher programs (Education Savings Accounts) advanced, with $1 billion allocated in the state budget. Democrats attempted to redirect funds to public schools but were unsuccessful.
    2. Higher Education Overhaul
      • Senate Bill 37: The Senate approved this bill. It restricts how universities teach topics like race and history. The bill allows complaints that could lead to funding cuts. Critics warn of faculty brain drain and threats to academic freedom.
    3. Border & Homeland Security
      • Senate Bill 36: Passed the Senate to create a Homeland Security Division under DPS, centralizing immigration enforcement and infrastructure protection. Part of a broader $6.5 billion border security budget.
    4. Energy & Environment
      • Renewable Energy Regulations: SB 819 (Kolhorst) sets new permitting and environmental rules on wind/solar projects. These rules contrast with lighter regulations for oil/gas. Critics argue it could hinder grid growth amid rising energy demand.
      • Power Grid Concerns: Bills like SB 388 (King) prioritize “dispatchable” energy (e.g., natural gas) over renewables, raising fears about meeting future electricity needs.
    5. State Budget & Spending
      • A $337 billion two-year budget was passed in the House, funding teacher pay, property tax cuts, and border security. Controversial amendments included redirecting $70 million from Medicaid to anti-abortion programs and failed attempts to defund universities over LGBTQ+ studies.
    6. Social Policy & Civil Rights
      • Abortion Laws: Lawmakers declined to expand exceptions for nonviable pregnancies, maintaining strict post-Roe restrictions.
      • LGBTQ+ Issues: Amendments targeting university funding for LGBTQ+ studies were withdrawn after heated debates.
    7. Election & Governance
      • A bill easing verification of hand-counted ballots passed the Senate, raising concerns about election integrity.

    Get more information on the Texas Tribune – Texas Legislature 2025.

  • Who Controls Schools? States vs. Washington in 2025

    Let’s talk about something big happening in education right now: Who gets to make the rules for schools? Is it your state government (like your governor or local lawmakers) or the federal government (like the President or Congress)? In 2025, this debate is heating up, and it’s changing how kids learn across the U.S. Let’s break it down!

    States Are Taking Charge

    States are passing lots of new laws to shape schools their way. For example, many states want kids to focus better in class, so they’re banning cellphones during school hours. Arkansas passed a law called the “Bell to Bell, No Cell Act.” This means no phones are allowed from the start to the end of the school day. Alaska is also pushing schools to create rules that keep phones out of classrooms.

    Next, states like Arizona and Florida are expanding “school choice.” Parents can use taxpayer money to send their kids to charter schools, which are public schools with special programs. They can also choose private schools or even pay for homeschooling supplies. Tennessee just approved a program that gives families $7,000 per student to spend on education costs. This could cover tutoring, online classes, or textbooks.

    Finally, some states are fighting over what schools can teach. Texas introduced a bill called SB 37, which stops colleges from teaching that racism is built into U.S. laws or that one race is “better” than another. Critics worry this could erase lessons about slavery or the civil rights movement. Florida has a similar law called the “Stop WOKE Act,” which limits how teachers talk about race and history.

    Why are states doing this? They feel they know what’s best for their communities. For example, Arizona is studying why teachers quit their jobs. They want to fix shortages. Georgia is spending money on reading programs for their young kids.

    The Federal Government Pushes Back

    Meanwhile, the federal government is making its own moves. One big change is cutting funding for DEI programs. DEI stands for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion—programs that help schools support students of different races, genders, and backgrounds. The U.S. Department of Education (well the Trump administration) calls these programs “divisive,” so they’re shutting some down (per the Mandate for Leadership aka Project 2025.) This affects teacher training and resources for minority students.

    The federal government is also enforcing new rules for transgender athletes. They say transgender girls are students born male who identify as female. These students can’t play on girls’ sports teams. They argue it’s unfair to athletes who were born female. States like Massachusetts and California disagree and are fighting these rules in court.

    Some lawmakers in Washington even want to get rid of the U.S. Department of Education entirely. A bill by Senator Mike Rounds would cancel programs that help homeless students, foster kids, and schools in low-income areas. Supporters say the federal government is too involved in local schools, but critics worry vulnerable students will lose support.

    Why is this happening? Supporters of these federal changes say schools should focus on basics like math and reading instead of “political” topics. They argue states should have more freedom to decide what’s taught.

    Clash of the Titans

    This isn’t just political arguing—it affects real families. For parents, more school choice means more options, but some worry it takes money away from public schools. Teachers in states like Florida might get a raise to $65,000 a year. However, federal cuts could mean fewer resources for classroom supplies or training. Students might benefit from phone bans. These bans can help them focus. However, losing DEI programs could make some feel left out. Others might feel misunderstood.

    Why Should You Care?

    1. Your Tax Dollars: These fights decide where your money goes—to public schools, private school vouchers, or federal programs.
    2. What Kids Learn: Will history classes teach about systemic racism? Can transgender athletes play sports? States and Washington disagree, and the answers will shape your child’s education.
    3. Local vs. National Values: Should Texas decide what’s taught in Texas schools, or should Washington set one rule for everyone?

    The Bottom Line

    It’s like a tug-of-war: states want freedom to make their own rules, while Washington wants consistency across the country. In 2025, this battle is changing everything from classroom policies to college sports. Whether you’re a parent, student, or taxpayer, these changes will affect you—so stay informed.

  • US-China Tariffs Rise to 104% Impact

    If you’ve heard the news about “tariffs” but aren’t sure what they are or why they matter, you’re not alone. Let’s break down what’s happening in simple terms.

    President Donald Trump holds up a chart of “reciprocal tariffs” during a “Make America Wealthy Again” trade announcement event in the Rose Garden at the White House on 4/2/2025 in Washington, DC.

    What’s Going On?

    Starting today (April 9, 2025), the U.S. government will impose a 104% tax on many products imported from China. This tax is called a “tariff.” It acts like a fee added to goods made in China that are sold in the U.S. The White House says this move is a response to China. China refused to remove its own taxes on American products.

    The jump to 104% didn’t happen overnight. First, the U.S. already had smaller tariffs (taxes) on Chinese goods. Last week, President Trump announced a new 34% tariff, which combined with existing taxes brought the total to 54%. When China didn’t back down, the U.S. added another 50%, leading to the 104% total.

    Why Is This Happening?

    The White House argues that China has treated American businesses unfairly for years. These tariffs are meant to pressure China into changing its policies, such as taxing U.S. goods or favoring Chinese companies over foreign ones. Officials claim the goal is to protect U.S. jobs and reduce America’s reliance on foreign goods, especially for essentials like medicine and technology.

    China, however, isn’t staying quiet. They’ve vowed to “fight till the end” and called the tariffs “blackmail.” In response, China announced its own 34% tax on American products, set to start Thursday.

    How Will This Affect You?

    Higher Prices
    Products made in China—like electronics, clothes, and appliances—could cost significantly more. For example, a pair of running shoes made in Vietnam might jump from 155 to 220. Even bigger price hikes could hit iPhones, which are mostly made in China. One analyst estimates a U.S.-made iPhone might cost $3,500 if production shifts to avoid tariffs.

    Stock Market Swings
    The tariff announcement has already caused wild swings in stock markets. Companies like Apple saw shares drop nearly 5% on Tuesday as investors worried about rising costs and slower sales.

    Shortages or Delays
    Some retailers are slow to fill orders or are increasing prices. Shoppers are buying extra everyday items because they worry about shortages or price increases soon.

    Can Companies Avoid These Costs?

    Some businesses are scrambling to move production out of China, but it’s not easy. Apple, for instance, makes most iPhones in China and is trying to shift some work to India. However, experts say relocating factories to the U.S. would take years and drive up costs even more. Other industries, like car manufacturing, face similar challenges. Canada, for example, plans to tax U.S.-made vehicles in retaliation, creating new hurdles for automakers.

    What’s Next?

    The White House says it’s open to “tailored deals” with countries willing to negotiate. For now, though, everyday shoppers might feel the pinch as prices rise. Whether this move strengthens U.S. jobs or backfires with higher costs and trade wars remains to be seen.

  • KP George: Fort Bend Money Laundering Charges Explained

    Fort Bend County Judge Kyle Persad (KP) George, a well-known Democratic leader in Texas, is facing serious legal trouble. He has been charged with two counts of money laundering. This felony could land him in prison for up to 10 years per charge if convicted. 

    Fort Bend County Judge KP George mugshot, April 2025

    The Charges

    Judge George is accused of laundering a sum between $30,000 and $150,000. This occurred between January and April 2019. This was shortly after he first took office as county judge. Prosecutors claim he hid money linked to illegal activity and falsified campaign finance reports to cover it up. He turned himself in on April 4th and was released on a $20,000 bond (10,000 per charge). These charges are separate from an earlier case. In that case, George was accused of allowing his former chief of staff. Taral Patel created fake social media accounts. These accounts were used to post racist comments during his 2022 reelection campaign. Patel faces felony online impersonation charges, and George was previously charged with a misdemeanor for identity misrepresentation in that scheme.

    George’s Response

    George has denied wrongdoing, calling the charges a “political witch hunt” by the Fort Bend County District Attorney’s Office. In a statement, he claimed his actions are legal. He argues that loaning his own money to his campaign and then repaying it later is allowed. This is permitted as long as it’s properly documented. In a fiery statement, he accused prosecutors of twisting facts to damage his reputation. However, Texas law requires strict transparency in campaign finances, and prosecutors allege George broke these rules. They haven’t yet shared specific evidence, leaving many questions unanswered.

    Political Fallout

    The case has sparked strong reactions across the Texas political scene. The Fort Bend County Democratic Party once supported Judge George. Now, they are urging him to step down. They cite a betrayal of public trust. Party Chairman Fred Taylor criticized George’s “victim mentality.” He criticized George’s attacks on the District Attorney’s office. Taylor argued that this behavior undermines confidence in local government. Meanwhile, County Commissioner Dexter L. McCoy described the charges as “deeply troubling.” He emphasized the importance of keeping the county’s operations running smoothly despite the controversy. On the other hand, Republicans have largely remained silent. Rumors suggest George might consider switching parties ahead of his potential 2026 reelection campaign. This adds another layer of intrigue to the situation.

    What’s Next?

    George’s trial will take place in the 458th District Court, separate from his pending misdemeanor case. Looking ahead, several critical questions remain unanswered. First, prosecutors will need to prove that George intentionally violated campaign finance laws. This task requires clear evidence of wrongdoing. Second, the ongoing legal battle could disrupt county operations, as the case may distract from important governance issues. If convicted, George would face prison time. He would also automatically lose his position as county judge under Texas law. This would effectively end his political career. The outcome of this trial could reshape Fort Bend County’s political landscape for years to come.

    Here’s a local news story from Fox26Houston.

  • Florida’s Proposed Education Cuts: What HB 5101 Means for Students

    Florida lawmakers are considering a plan to slash funding for advanced high school programs like AP (Advanced Placement), IB (International Baccalaureate), dual enrollment, and career/technical courses by up to 50%. These programs help students earn college credits while still in high school, saving them time and money. If this cut happens, it could hurt thousands of students—especially those from low-income families who rely on these programs to get ahead. Currently, Florida schools receive extra money called “funding weights” for providing challenging academic programs. HB 5101 would eliminate or reduce many of these financial incentives.

    House Bill 5101 (HB 5101), which recently passed a House committee vote, would cut financial incentives for schools offering college-level and career-focused programs. These cuts could have serious consequences for students across the state, particularly those from low-income families and rural areas. Below is the bill analysis from the Florida House of Representatives. You can also find the document here.

    Why Does This Matter?

    1. College Credit at Risk – Programs like AP and dual enrollment let high schoolers take college-level classes. students would have fewer opportunities to earn college credits while still in high school, potentially adding thousands of dollars to their future college costs. Second, career training programs that prepare students for good-paying jobs right after graduation might disappear from some schools. Cutting funding could mean fewer courses, fewer teachers, and fewer students getting a head start on college.
    2. Low-Income Students Hurt the Most – Wealthier families might pay for college prep on their own, but many students depend on these free or low-cost programs. Without them, some may struggle to afford or even qualify for college.
    3. Career/Technical Programs on the Chopping Block – Not every student goes to a four-year college. Career-focused courses (like nursing, IT, or auto tech) help students get skilled jobs right after high school. Cutting funds could limit their opportunities.

    These changes would likely widen existing educational inequalities. Wealthier districts and families might find ways to maintain these programs, but schools in poor and rural areas could lose them completely. This creates an unfair situation where a student’s access to advanced opportunities depends on their zip code or family income.

    School Districts Push Back

    Education leaders across Florida are expressing serious concerns about HB 5101. Large urban districts like Miami-Dade and Broward worry they’ll have to eliminate advanced courses that serve thousands of students. Small rural districts fear they may lose these programs entirely due to lack of funding.

    Many educators emphasize that these programs are crucial for college preparation and workforce development. Career/technical programs in particular help address Florida’s skilled labor shortages by training the next generation of nurses, technicians, and tradespeople.

    Will Other Southern States Follow?

    Florida often sets trends in education policy, especially in conservative-led states. If these cuts happen, states like Texas, Georgia, Alabama, Louisiana, and Mississippi might consider similar moves to reduce education spending. Some lawmakers argue these programs are too expensive, but students and parents say they’re worth the investment.

    What’s Next?

    As the bill moves through the legislative process, its ultimate impact remains uncertain. If passed, the changes would take effect July 1, 2025 for the 2025-26 school year. Other states, particularly in the South, may watch Florida’s decision closely as they consider their own education budgets.

    The debate highlights an important question: Should Florida invest more in advanced educational opportunities, or are these programs an unnecessary expense? The answer could shape the future of thousands of students across the state.

    Education should open doors, not close them. If these programs shrink, many students—especially those who need them most—could lose their chance at a brighter future.

    What do you think? Should states cut funding for advanced high school courses, or is this a mistake? Let us know in the comments!

  • Judge Dismisses Corruption Case Against NYC Mayor Eric Adams

    New York City Mayor Eric Adams can breathe a sigh of relief after a recent corruption case against him was dismissed with prejudice. This legal term means the case is permanently closed—prosecutors cannot bring the same charges again. Let’s break down what happened, why it matters, and what comes next.

    Background of the Case

    In 2024, Mayor Adams faced accusations of corruption. Reports suggested the case involved claims of misuse of power. They also hinted at unethical dealings. However, specific details weren’t fully disclosed to the public. These types of allegations are serious, especially for a public figure like a mayor. However, the court recently decided to throw out the case entirely.

    The Court’s Decision

    U.S. District Judge Dale Ho issued a 78-page ruling criticizing the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) handling of the case. He expressed concerns that the DOJ’s actions appeared politically motivated and lacked sufficient legal justification. The judge emphasized that dismissing the case with prejudice was necessary. This was to prevent any future misuse of the charges for political leverage. ​

    Reactions and Implications

    The dismissal has elicited varied reactions. Mayor Adams expressed relief and reiterated his commitment to serving New York City. He stated that the case should never have been initiated and that he had done nothing wrong. ​

    However, the DOJ’s decision to seek dismissal led to internal disagreements, resulting in several prosecutors resigning in protest. They argued that the move was politically motivated and compromised the integrity of the justice system. ​

    With the legal obstacles removed, Mayor Adams can now focus on governing and his upcoming re-election campaign. He faces competition, notably from former Governor Andrew Cuomo, in the Democratic primary scheduled for June.

    Conclusion

    The dismissal of the corruption charges against Mayor Eric Adams marks a pivotal moment in New York City’s political landscape. Adams views this as a vindication. However, the circumstances surrounding the case’s dismissal have sparked debates about the intersection of justice and politics.​

  • Understanding the Significance of Booker’s 25-Hour Speech

    On March 31, 2025, Senator Cory Booker from New Jersey delivered a historic speech in the U.S. Senate. It lasted 25 hours and 5 minutes. This set a new record for the longest individual floor speech in Senate history. This surpassed the previous record of 24 hours and 18 minutes set by Senator Strom Thurmond in 1957.

    Purpose of the Speech

    Senator Booker aimed to protest against President Donald Trump’s policies and actions during his second term. He expressed concerns over efforts to eliminate the Department of Education, disregard judicial mandates, and deport participants of the 2024 pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses. Booker criticized the administration for showing “a complete disregard for the rule of law, the Constitution, and the needs of the American people.”

    Key Issues Addressed

    Throughout his speech, Senator Booker highlighted several critical issues:​

    • Education Department Elimination: Booker opposed efforts to dismantle the Department of Education, highlighting the importance of federal support for schools.
    • Social Security Cuts: He opposed proposed cuts to Social Security, emphasizing the negative impact on vulnerable citizens.
    • Tariffs and Economic Policies: Booker discussed concerns about the administration’s tariff plans and their potential effects on the economy.
    • Immigration Policies: He criticized the deportation of individuals involved in peaceful protests, viewing it as an infringement on civil liberties. ​

    Historical Context

    Booker’s speech carried symbolic weight by surpassing Strom Thurmond’s 1957 filibuster against the Civil Rights Act. Thurmond’s speech was aimed at opposing civil rights. Booker’s speech defended civil rights. If you have the time to read, I dropped below the actual Congressional record of Thurmond’s filibuster.

    Support and Reactions

    Fellow Democrats, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Senator Chris Murphy, supported Booker during his speech. The speech garnered significant public attention, with tens of thousands watching live online.

    Conclusion

    Senator Cory Booker’s marathon speech was a significant protest against the Trump administration’s policies. By addressing key issues and invoking the legacy of civil rights leaders, Booker aimed to rally opposition and focus on possible dangers to American democracy

    For those interested in viewing highlights from Senator Booker’s speech, you can watch the following video: